A 318 Poly 4 bbl is the same-ish HP as the 440
No, Sir...Not at all.
The Poly and the LA 318s were over-rated by a mile. Back then, HP ratings were bullshit....Its as if they didn't even try to make sense.
230 HP for a '69 318? That was not only a GROSS rating, it was an inflated gross rating
The same engine was rated at 150 HP in 1972 even though it was essentially unchanged.
In 1972, the Feds cracked down and the automakers had to revise their ratings to reflect the power ratings as installed in vehicles. This meant the power draw of the water pump, Fan, fuel pump, closed element air cleaner, alternator, A/C compressor and P/S pump in place and functioning. All that stuff does not rob an engine of 80 HP. 230 versus 150? Pffftttt.
The 440 had many ratings from the 1966 introduction to the end of the run in 1978.
1966-70 Imperials and C bodies with single exhaust were usually rated at 350 HP. The 440 Magnum in the '69 Dart and Barracuda, the 68-70 B bodies and 70 E bodies had a different cam, exhaust manifolds and dual exhaust, giving them a 375 HP Gross rating. In 1971, compression dropped almost 2 points advertised and HP dropped as well.
The car, truck and van 440s of the mid to late 70s were rated as low as 190 HP but it still had torque. The blocks of the 440s were all essentially the same and worthy of a quality rebuild. Even the cast cranks were decent. I built a '78 440 with milled heads and a 280/474 cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, 1 7/8" headers and a Holley 750. That mill went 14.01 at 100 mph with a pitiful 2.2 60 ft time in this car: