Got the hurricane out of the way, stripped water pump thread issue resolved, and the 180 degree thermostat installed.
The end result for the 180 degree thermostat, no thermostat and the 195 degree thermostat are pretty much the same as I thought they would be. Thanks for letting me strip my water pump housing threads to prove it! LOL
Car runs 205 to 210 with the 180 or 195 thermostat and dips to a hair under 200 at idle in the heat with the A/C on. I don't really seem to have a "stuck in traffic with creeping temp" problem. A/C on or off does not seem to make much temperature difference. A 160 thermostat should give the exact same result after full temperature is reached.
The car may have run just few degrees cooler without the thermostat and I assume this is due to better water circulation. The thermostat helps the car to come to operating temperature quicker and keeps it at preferred operating temperature if operating temperature is otherwise below where it should be (180). A lower temperature thermostat appears to do nothing to reduce temp for a car that runs above that temp at full warm up, or at least this car. You have to remember that if you have a car designed to run 180 that runs at 160, that is not necessarily a good thing. It may not be running efficiently at 160.
Without the thermostat, the radiator is the primary restriction, but it does seem that cooling was a little better. I could run the car year round without a thermostat in the FL climate, but in most climates it would not be recommended due to impact on heater warmup and operating temperature in winter.
I have been reading other forums on this issue and ran across some interesting articles on the differences waterpumps and in OEM verses aluminum waterpump housings. It appears that some of the aluminum 440Source water pump housings has some significant flow restriction issues. Chinese reverse engineering of an existing part seems to be limited by their tooling equipment, but it does not keep them from manufacturing and selling stuff in the US. If you buy a no brand aluminum water pump housing or water pump off ebay, buyer beware.
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,60599.0.htm
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,96616.0.html
Another interesting link was a guy that tested eight different Mopar water pumps for flow over various RPM ranges from OEM to high flow, six blade, eight blade, curved blade, reverse curved blade, metal blade, plastic blade, with anti-cavitation plate, without anti-cavitation plate, and even a Mopar marine water pump. He actually installed them on the same engine and attached them to a flow meter to get flow at various normal operating RPM's. His finding seem to be that there is no significant difference, so you can't beat an OEM water pump and for some reason the marine pumps a lot of water at low RPM, and might be a cure for idling overheating. I believe the OEM came in behind the Marine somewhat in both low and high RPM flow.
They also talk a little about drag racing needs. Lots of idling in drag racing and short bursts followed by a cool down. Track racing is totally different. When you buy something "high performance" for racing the type of racing really matters. A street car may experience more extremes in both idling and continual high RPM operation both than a race car.
This is a pretty interesting read. I am thinking these guys on the Charger forum are like scientists, collecting and testing various products. I like that approach!
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,60599.200.html
None of this solves my issue, except they seem to stay sticking with OEM is best since the engineers who designed the car probably knew best. My car is essentually all OEM from the factory A/C to the radiator, to the shroud, to the thermostat now 180. I have a slightly higher flow water pump, but don't really know if any higher flow than a factory A/C water pump if different. When you buy one, they don't seem to list A/C or non A/C pumps. The one I installed is supposed to flow 30% higher than OEM, which is close to OEM. The other thing different is the heavy duty thermal clutch fan. I don't think either of these are making a difference in my car running over 200 degrees on a hot day with the A/C on.
I still plan to check timing, advance, A/F ratio and vacuum to rule that out. If that is in spec, I think I just have to accept running 205-210 on a hot day with the A/C on as "normal" for this car as long as it never gets hot enough to spit coolant. It would be interesting to know what a dealership would have said back "in the day".
I remember my dad taking a 70 Chevy Impala under warranty back to the dealership because the trunk leaked and having them return the car to him with one of the factory drain plugs removed from the trunk floor on the side it was leaking as the solution! These cars were not built to close tolerance. I bought a new Ford in 1972 and when I returned it to the dealer after normal break-in period because it consumed a quart of oil every 600 miles, they said that was within acceptable oil consumption standard. I traded the car in in 1974 on another Ford that did not have the problem.
Sadly enough, Audi was telling their customers the same thing regarding oil consumption on their 2.0 turbo engines a two or three years ago. They were claiming it was a "high performance" engine, and as such, was expected to consume synthetic oil at a rate of up to a quart every thousand miles. I think a class action suit finally changed their tune.