Who was bein smartass? I am dead serious. GM used fiberglass drive shafts in almost all their half ton trucks from 88-98.
Here is but one of many companies that offer them.
http://www.strongwell.com/selected_markets/comp_driveshaft/
They used .065 wall AL shafts wrapped in CFF to keep the flexing of the AL down since it will make a pinging noise everytime the shaft is loaded.
fiberglass without the CF would crack in that environment
Is there any balance between weight savings and a loss in rotating balance and inertia? You know, could something with that kind of length to diameter difference be TOO light for the application if strength is equal?
I replaced my driveshaft last year and the driveline shop said a mild steel shaft in 3" diameter was just as good as a smaller diameter chrome moly steel shaft and he claimed it balanced and perform better than a 2.5" shaft due to decreasing the length to diameter ratio, so now I have a 3" mild steel shaft on my car. I didn't check out aluminum shafts but I know that the Denny's driveshafts are super expensive.
Anyone else running 3"?
That is not correct, a 3 stl shaft will see higher rpm than a 2.5 cm stl shaft, and the strength is not better really, the rpm capabilities and strength between the 2 are very close.
lets use 50" long as an example and 3", 3" stl will be safe to 6500 and the 3" CM stl will be safe an additional 150 rpm, in 2.5 you lost some tq capability and you lost 1000 rpm and are going to have a issue at 5500 rpm rather than 6500 with reg stl 3".
AL shafts because the weight is less can experience more rpm than stl at the same diameter.
with the horse power of a 440...do ya REALLY think 20 pounds makes that much of a difference? with the juice my 440 has...i would not trust anything but steel.
When you lose half the weight of the shaft Stl vs AL you can expect .007 to .010 of time loss in acceleration, and you'll gain rpm and mileage.
Stl to AL is 99.9% always at the least half, in some cases it is even more weight loss depending.
If you have a 20 lb shaft in stl it'll be 10 lbs in AL which is a lot of weight loss in the driveline and pounds lost in the driveline are equivalent to 10's lost carrying, so losing 10 lbs is like losing 200 lbs carrying.
I don't use anything but AL in my performance stuff, and trucks are far heavier than your car and making more tq than you, and i have many race boats on AL which are far more abusive than cars and trucks.
I have AL shafts in heavy 3700 lb cars doing in 8.0s and cars in the 1.1teen 60's and even adrl pro cars in the .9 area.
AL is not weak.
CF shafts are as light and in some cases a little lighter than AL, but CF unlike Stl and AL have no flex at all within the tube, and if they break and they are designed right they will kinda rag and splinter, if they are built for far more than they need to and break by having something contact them they can keep there form.
.
- - - Updated - - -
As for the original question of the ford shafts, those are made by visteon, and if they are the .110 tube they are ok for some good power, stay away from the AAM AL shafts and some of the visteon shafts which you won't know they're junk till you see your local driveline shop and they confirm.
The aam shafts many of them are mostly .068 and that's fine for your car if it's not performance , if you have a stock 340/360/383/440 they'll be fine, once you're past the 500hp area those shafts become your risk.
Many of the truck AL shafts will be 4", 4.5", 5" and 6" shafts, of which 5" and 6" shafts are going to be a problem in the car unless you have no rear suspension, some of the 4.5" may also be a issue.
Then there are the swedged tube AL shafts, that come in some trucks and when they are shortened you can't use the weld yoke in the larger part of the tube and between the right yoke and machining you're far better off having your local driveline shop make you a new AL shaft.
Stay away from oil soaked used AL shafts that will need to be shortened, AL is kinda porous and oil/whatever soaked shafts i stay away from with shafts like that because the contaminants soak into the AL and cleaning them with other solvents and scrubbing them with particular stainless stl still makes a 50/50 chance, and heating tubes used in driveline to clean or burn out contaminants is not a good idea with AL and when welding you'll see the problem and it could work and it could fail and instead of having a shop say they aren't going to guarantee that and a problem does happen you're better off leaving that filthy piece right where it is rather than chance it.
.