![quote_icon.png](/moparforum/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.forjeepsonly.com%2Fjeep-forum%2Fimages%2Fmisc%2Fquote_icon.png&hash=6664286e2655010e4fc48f2b0d6aec2d)
![](/moparforum/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.forjeepsonly.com%2Fjeep-forum%2Fimages%2Fbuttons%2Fviewpost-right.png&hash=d469d2eea1d68283b2ff89fd05e4c381)
with the horse power of a 440...do ya REALLY think 20 pounds makes that much of a difference? with the juice my 440 has...i would not trust anything but steel.
When you lose half the weight of the shaft Stl vs AL you can expect .007 to .010 of time loss in acceleration, and you'll gain rpm and mileage.
Stl to AL is 99.9% always at the least half, in some cases it is even more weight loss depending.
If you have a 20 lb shaft in stl it'll be 10 lbs in AL which is a lot of weight loss in the driveline and pounds lost in the driveline are equivalent to 10's lost carrying, so losing 10 lbs is like losing 200 lbs carrying.
I don't use anything but AL in my performance stuff, and trucks are far heavier than your car and making more tq than you, and i have many race boats on AL which are far more abusive than cars and trucks.
I have AL shafts in heavy 3700 lb cars doing in 8.0s and cars in the 1.1teen 60's and even adrl pro cars in the .9 area.
AL is not weak.
CF shafts are as light and in some cases a little lighter than AL, but CF unlike Stl and AL have no flex at all within the tube, and if they break and they are designed right they will kinda rag and splinter, if they are built for far more than they need to and break by having something contact them they can keep there form.
thats all well fine and good if i was racing any of my cars, but i dont do that. i can fully understand the weight thing and how its important to those that do race. i did that years ago and got my YA-YA's out back then....now i just drive them and terrorize Camaros (vomit). thats WAY more fun than racing was!:headbang: