10.94What size are the rotors 10.94 or 12”?
Yes this was the problem. I wasn't aware that the tabs had to be bent. You can see how much gap I have if the tab is bent correctly. Awesome. Thanks very much.Its the pad its to loose and dropping down. Bend the tabs and it will pull the pad up. The fix is plain as day. Blow the picture up. The green circles show how much of a gap there is. That end the pad is shown sitting higher. The tab still needs to be bent to keep the pad up. The opposite end the tab is hitting but the pad is hanging down. That is allowing the pad to rub the rotor. I always bend the tabs so the pad needs to be lightly tapped into the caliper for proper seating. Both people have the same problem. Parts are correct. I could have both fixed in less time than it took me to type this. Blow up the pictures and you can clearly see the problems.
Glad it worked out for you. Simple fix.Yes this was the problem. I wasn't aware that the tabs had to be bent. You can see how much gap I have if the tab is bent correctly. Awesome. Thanks very much.
View attachment 1214198 View attachment 1214199
Glad it worked out for you. Simple fix.
MoparLeo has a good eye. I am not an expert on this, but there is a common brake conversion done on these cars to convert to 1973+ brake rotors, 73+ A-body spindles. Some of the conversions are done using Cordoba rotors and caliper brackets. "Maybe" the previous owner started to do one of those conversions and got mixed up on exactly which parts to use? Or they simply got the wrong parts and put them on?
As I mentioned, I'm not an expert on this, but I did one of those swaps on my 1970 car and your rotors kinda look like my 73+ rotors. So....maybe check for any numbers you can find on the calipers, rotors, caliper brackets and spindles and let us know. (larger pictures would help too). There are many number experts on here that can figure this out for you. Maybe also check the other side and see which parts are different?