You should be making that comparison as how many GTX vs Charger R/T for the same year. That would be more of an apples to apples comparison.It is true Charger got Charger only panels. Charger is a Dodge. That got more resources. It was a broader baseline. One could get a 6 cylinder if they so ordered. Not true with GTX. Plymouth took a big gamble in '67. It was "Muscle" or bust. For this and the fact that Plymouth all but carried Chrysler thru the performance wars of the Muscle car era (64-71) is why I prefer Plymouth. In the A and E body world? It's not close. Barracuda out duels Dart. Cuda out paced Challenger. Including in today's sales markets.
In 1969 they made a little over 15k GTX. They made about 90k Chargers.
I've never owned Dodge. For me? Plymouth's look better. And have a better performance pedigree. (For lack of a better word.)
JMO of course.
Chrysler styling was always a little off, but they truly caught lightning in a bottle when they designed the 2nd gen Chargers.
It is true Charger got Charger only panels. Charger is a Dodge. That got more resources. It was a broader baseline. One could get a 6 cylinder if they so ordered. Not true with GTX. Plymouth took a big gamble in '67. It was "Muscle" or bust. For this and the fact that Plymouth all but carried Chrysler thru the performance wars of the Muscle car era (64-71) is why I prefer Plymouth. In the A and E body world? It's not close. Barracuda out duels Dart. Cuda out paced Challenger. Including in today's sales markets.
In 1969 they made a little over 15k GTX. They made about 90k Chargers.
I've never owned Dodge. For me? Plymouth's look better. And have a better performance pedigree. (For lack of a better word.)
JMO of course.
Chrysler styling was always a little off, but they truly caught lightning in a bottle when they designed the 2nd gen Chargers.
It is. And I believe it started with the GTO. (At least the Muscle car era) That was nothing more than a Tempest/Lemans with as big of motor available and a little bling badging? Damn. Now I feel even more gullible? "Here phishy phishy!"It's amazing how bulge hoods (and hoods with scoops), stripes, trim appointments & factory mags dressed up average daily drivers back in the day. This goes not only for Mopar, but Ford & GM also.
The new charger shoulda been more retro with a 68-70 look to it, like the new challenger is a retro to the 70-71 models
Why? GTX didn't have sub models? It was Muscle of Bust. It's no secret Dodge got credit while Plymouth carried the weight. RoadRunner was car of the year for '69. Not sure Charger was in top 5. Look at Nascar then? (Chrysler boycotted '65) Most wins. '66 Plymouth. '67 Plymouth. '70 Plymouth. The only reason they didn't win manufacturer championships is because they didn't have enough cars overall.You should be making that comparison as how many GTX vs Charger R/T for the same year. That would be more of an apples to apples comparison.
The Belvedere, Satellite, Road Runner, and GTX 2 door hardtop and pillared coupe models all used the same exterior sheetmetal. Not so with the Dodge. Nothing exterior sheetmetalwise interchanges from a Coronet to a Charger.
This being said, compare all plymouth 2 door hardtop and pillared coupe production for any given year, to all charger production for any given year and charger is a lot lower production.
Not worse, just different kind of bling bling. We are attracted to Tits and ***, and shiny things with wheels. The tits and ***, accessorizes with shiny bling bling to attract us away from the shiny things on 4 wheels.It is. And I believe it started with the GTO. (At least the Muscle car era) That was nothing more than a Tempest/Lemans with as big of motor available and a little bling badging? Damn. Now I feel even more gullible? "Here phishy phishy!"
I have teased lady friends in the past for being easily distracted by shiny items. (Thus why diamonds are so expensive.) But in reality? Us men might be worse?
Me likey blingy! Lol.Not worse, just different kind of bling bling. We are attracted to Tits and ***, and shiny things with wheels. The tits and ***, accessorizes with shiny bling bling to attract us away from the shiny things on 4 wheels.
My 74yo father bought a ‘18 392 6 speed T/A. Zero options but the larger touch screen. That car is awesome!!
I test drove 2 Scat Pack 6 speeds, beautiful cars, too beautiful to be my driver. I'd end up treating it like a show car and I have enough of those. I found a used 2018 R/T that is good enough for daily use. What happens is the car is such a pleasure to drive that it endears itself to "you" and you want to baby it and buy stuff for it. I found a pair of leather bucket and back seats and door panels so changed out the cloth interior. It may be just an R/T but the insurance and maintenance is cheaper than higher performance pkgs and I can run it on 87.
How does your dad like it? I do at least 100mph almost every time I drive mine.
Bill Brownlee,Head of the Dodge styling studio,wanted the second generation Charger clay mockup scrapped. He told Richard Sias,who had drawn the original double diamond sketches of the second generation Chargers,to get rid of it. Fortunately for us,Brownlee took a two week vacation, and Sais and the other designers finished the project. Brownlee's boss,who I believe was Virgil Exner saw the mockup and said that is what a muscle car is supposed to look like! Brownlee was livid when he returned and saw the mockup finished in the studio,he ranted and raved about how he told them to scrap the design. Once he found out that his boss loved the design he had to suck it up and accept it as the new Dodge Charger for the 68 model year The one thing that he did was walk over to the mockup, rip the fuel cap off the center of the rear tail panel and place it on top of the left rear quarter panel and turned to his subordinates and said, this belongs here! Sais got little to no credit for the second generation Chargers design, and Brownlee begrudgingly took the accolades for the cars success,as well as almost an 80% increase in sales over the 67 Chargers sales. It was the price Sais paid for going over the bosses head. When Sais left to work for an air craft company as an interior designer, his coworkers never believed him when he said that he designed the second generation Charger, and often laughed behind his back about it. One day one of his fellow former colleagues from the Dodge design studio showed up at the aircraft company with the design award for him,for designing the 68 Dodge Charger and gave it to him in front of his coworkers! That's how close the design was to going in the scrap bin. Sias also designed both the Charger and Challenger script emblems.Chrysler styling was always a little off, but they truly caught lightning in a bottle when they designed the 2nd gen Chargers.