ProCar/Scat buckets are relatively light (for street/strip duty)
including the adjuster rails
($750-ish for both seats & brackets in 2007 $$s, more now)
Elite 1100
I liked the low profile & the best widths, for me
View attachment 1473328
Lowback 1400
I wanted to go with these, but sat too high up
& a bit narrower, no real bolsters either
They're a lot like an A-100 style seat
or a VW seat (IIRC is what they were patterned after)
I suspect the weight savings was, the lack of adj. headrests
View attachment 1473329
Rally 1000
they look the best, but a lot of bolster on the sides
& still too high for my taste (or torso)
I guess I could have damn near mounted them
almost on the floor, made/modified some custom brackets
View attachment 1473330
their mounting brackets are a lil' heavy for what they are
9#s each IIRC (my car has the Elite 1100, leather)
drivers side 9#s shipped/including hardware
View attachment 1473335
pass. side 9#s including hardware
View attachment 1473336
I liked the Elites 1100 best of the 3
I have a taller torso & it gives me way better headroom
didn't have to fab up any special mounts
& keeps me in the seat way better with the nice-sized bolsters
(not too big, 3 bears approach, just right)
than any factory seat ever could/did
My 1968 RR
mine was a Decore Inter. all Black, 1968 only had benches
with the 3 belts, bench seat, tracks etc. 'all factory perfect in shape'
so it weighed in at 113#s
it was 132#s 'shipping weight',
19#s was 1x1" frame, belts, cardboard & tape
I ended up selling to a FBBO member here in Calif.
he came & picked the bench up for $250, he got a real steal
to ship it was going to be like $300 alone
![realcrazy :realcrazy: :realcrazy:](/moparforum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/realcrazy.gif)
10+ years ago
I'm at like 2/3s of that org. weight & only 2 belts now
2 seats & 2 brackets @ 78#s combined + the 2 belts
(belts vary vastly depending on what style & how many points harness)
I like the feel & seating position,
adj. headrests & adjust. seat backs are a plus too
not a real racing seat, but depends on what you're doing
it could be easily adapted to be
(some day I may even have them covered in a closer pattern to stock)
for now it's fine
View attachment 1473337
I liked the low backs style, but I also wanted headrests
View attachment 1473358
These have adjust. headrests too
I wish the pattern was closer to the org.
perpendicular (like the 68s were) instead of up & down
View attachment 1473359
may help someone