• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

What's it Worth 68 coronet rt convertible

To me that undercoating looks factory, later touched up. It could possibly be dead solid underneath it, or not. There is just no way of knowing without either removing it or if he'll let you, try to punch a screwdriver through in spots.
If I was looking at the car and the price was reasonable I would probably accept the risk as it looks pretty good. If the price was upper end to what I thought it should be I would insist on trying to punch a screwdriver through. Hopefully that makes sense.
Maybe I'm wrong and it's your money but I think I would be pretty excited about this car. I'd be driving it after glossing over the mechanical and enjoying cruising it without worrying about the minor cosmetic faults. On a car like this it just adds charactor. I appreciate a car that looks to be looked after over the decades and what you see is what you get. New paint and body quite often means you're buying about half of what came out the factory and about half replaced.
 
As mentioned, proceed with caution on undercoating, but this looks more precautionary than deceptive. Looks pretty clean and solid underneath, just heavily boogered.

Less is best on the entry price. Wheels and tires need replaced. The brakes, drivetrain, fuel system, cooling system will all need service. If you can turn your own wrenches, it's just time and part sourcing. Gets costly quickly through a competent shop. You already mentioned exhaust needs replaced. Interior is original so it tells the truth, but presents as such.

Are you going to make a move on it?
 
There were always low production numbers of R/ T convertibles; likely less than a 1,000. At shows, I find the '68 R/T to be the least seen. Headrests were an option on 1968 R/T's, and became standard equipment after January 1, 1969. Although a 26" radiator was standard equipment on a 1967 R/T, it became an option in 1968 and later. So, it is not unusual to see a 22" radiator in these cars. The Charger-inspired Rallye dash was also an option. I own a 1967 R/T.

There were fewer R/T convertibles made in four years (1,976) than there were 69 Road Runner convertibles made in one year (2,128). R/T convertibles are not common.

The 22" radiator was standard 68-70 meaning most this is what most R/Ts had. Ordering a/c, trailer towing or an axle pacage that increased cooling demand got you the 26" radiator. A 26" radiator was not something that was a stand alone option.

In terms of desirability, I don't believe the '68 is the least desirable. While most plentiful, I think the '67 is the least 'desirable', and I do not like using that term, due to the squared off styling. The polarizing front end of the '70 drives down demand, or the number of people looking to buy one, but the scarcity ups the price as so few examples come up for sale. The styling of the '68 with the delta tail light ups buyer interest. I prefer the styling of the '69 due to the front grill.

I own a '69 R/T convertible.

It appears to be a relatively solid and complete driver quality car. I think contingent on several things already mentioned, I don't think 40K plus or minus is out of the realm.
 
Looks like one of the many different anti rust coatings they used over there like ziebart etc.. oily,greasy, waxy, stuff. I've seen many different kinds from Ontario. Check for rubber plugs in the door jambs
 
It looks like the factory undercoating to me also. It does look to be a heavier coating though. Maybe it was done Monday morning and the applier was hung over and moving slow.
 
In terms of desirability, I don't believe the '68 is the least desirable. While most plentiful, I think the '67 is the least 'desirable', and I do not like using that term, due to the squared off styling.
It's a weird thing. Desirable. Desirable to who exactly? More people bought mustangs.. do we care what a mustang owner finds Desirable?
To someone who wants a 68 Coronet, that's the most Desirable car..
 
Looks like one of the many different anti rust coatings they used over there like ziebart etc.. oily,greasy, waxy, stuff. I've seen many different kinds from Ontario. Check for rubber plugs in the door jambs
There was a '68 GTX from central PA, bought and flipped on this site a few years back. Original factory undercoating, plus Ziebert when new. Looked like the Coronet in this thread underneath, with even more gloop. I checked the car out when it was in the car corral at Carlisle, before the flipper bought it. Perfect original metal, held a kitchen magnet the whole way around. If I'd had storage space, I'd have grabbed it in a heartbeat, was priced at $32,500.
 
It's a weird thing. Desirable. Desirable to who exactly? More people bought mustangs.. do we care what a mustang owner finds Desirable?
To someone who wants a 68 Coronet, that's the most Desirable car..

I agree. I don't think the term 'desirable' was necessarily appropriate. I was echoing the term from a previous post. It reflects strength of personal choice.

I think the market tells us that between two comparably equipped '67 and 68s' the '68's will sell for more. That may not equal desirability.
 
When the comment about no exhaust was made I expected rotten remains to be hanging under the car... The pipes being cut away and what remains appears reasonably solid makes me feel better about what is there...

I half expected to see the edges of the holes in the frame to be eaten thin, salty crud enters through those low hanging openings and eats the metal from the inside... What I see is actually pretty promising...

I'd still feel better if I could poke at it but it doesn't look nearly as bad as some cars I've seen, cars that people have spent big $$$$ on...
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top