67 B-body
Well-Known Member
I understand that in regards to mechanical "non-roller" lifters and cams, but if the manufacturer intended solid roller lifters to be ran on hydraulic roller cams, they would not have used different part numbers and just made one style of cam for everything then would they not?
what I am saying is that they make the mechanical and the hydraulic roller cams/lifters for a certain reason, if it made more sense and created a more efficient means to obtain horsepower to run a mechanical roller lifter on a hydraulic roller cam, then they would package that option and try to sell it instead of keeping them separate like they do.
It isn't a matter of could you do it, but should you.
WTH are you talking about??? of course they design cams and lifters differently for different applications..... No one is saying they don't. My first post was in reply to a built in ramp that spins the lifter. He later said he thought it was a flat hyd "non roller" cam the OP was commenting on.... You replied to my post regarding this..... My post...... Why would you want to do that and change the topic of My post???? YES,,,, THE LIFTERS ARE DIFFERENT!
Also, Comp told him it was fine to run this combination, and gave him the lash specs to do so... I know this because I read his post...