My experience has paralleled yours. Unlike Hey-O, who assessed the situation perfectly, I bought homes on a limited basis, owning only four in my lifetime. Having to sell one to buy another puts you at a disadvantage. When my wife and I moved to the Chicago area thirty years ago, this kicked us in the head. Had a soft market at the time in PA (similar to today, with interest rates working against us,) combined with limited supply in our range in the new location - most were too small, or McMansions we refused to pay for.
We broke even on the home we sold in PA, but later took a loss on the place in northwest Indiana, in the name of a quick sale. But we had planned the move a year in advance, and that was part of the process. I liquidated my stable of Mopars (three at the time,) most of our furniture, ending up with 9000 lbs of household goods for the move, about half what a married couple in their late 40s would normally carry. We rented a small duplex in State College, and filled the garage with boxes, rather than unpacking the stuff.
During the period I was searching the internet for our permanent home, we narrowed our search to one neighborhood. We hit pay dirt when we found a place that had been owned by a regional bank vice president, who had been promoted, and moved a few months earlier. School was in session, the market was soft, and the relocation company wanted to be rid of the place. We bought it with a low ball offer. In 23 years, we've seen nearly 400K in appreciation, making up for the loss of the earlier move exponentially.
The fact that you don't have to move tomorrow will work in your favor in the end.