66 Sat
Well-Known Member
Hold on, hold on..that was me and you're cherry picking my comments to suit your argument. I asked the question on A bodies because they have more small blocks over there.Ah, yes the Holley vac carb. Didn't do to well against a 625 AFB [ see below ]. Made less tq, less hp & used more fuel....
Over on FABO, you will see a thread where a Poly Stroker engine had a 600 vac sec Holley removed & replaced with a Edel AVS2. When the owner went for a test drive with the AVS & went to WOT, he thought the trans had kicked down to 2nd such was the acceleration improvement. But no, still in high gear....The smelly was also gone....
View attachment 1578982
I've had a Holley 1850, 600 vac sec on the car for 4 years. The cheapest most basic 600 Holley. Performs faultlessly. I've also got an old Holley 700 D/P that was was on the car when I bought it. The car is a bit faster with this bigger carb and I swap them around for fun.
I wanted to try something else and after A LOT of research and debate I bought a Edelbrock AVS2 650.
It's been on the car for a week and I have mixed feelings about it.
It's true that the wide open throttle acceleration felt stronger than the 600 Holley (and similar to the 700 D/P).
It's true that I used to get an "engine smell" after full throttle with both Holleys that is absent with the AVS2.
However...the low speed throttle response of the AVS2 is weaker than both Holleys, which I was not expecting. I'm assuming it's a tuning issue.
There's a big full throttle bog as well that I'm trying to tune out, which is a fairly common issue.
I also think the Holleys are built better. The linkages on the Edelbrock all have lots of play in them, held together by tiny clips. It feels a bit cheap. The Holley linkages feel more solid, better quality.
So, the jury is still out. I've got to tune this carb properly before I can give a verdict.
Last edited: