....thumbs up just for the sounds of a Swedish Acid Bath....
...im heading over...
watermelon
...im heading over...
watermelon
Looking good!Finally got som quality time with the Charger again so I completed the exhaust wrapping, mounted clutch, bellhousing and gearbox. Of course I needed to do some manufacturing again. Had to make a bushing for the hydraulic throw-out bearing since the shims delivered didn't do the job..
View attachment 1023904 View attachment 1023906 View attachment 1023907 View attachment 1023908 View attachment 1023909 View attachment 1023910 View attachment 1023911
Is that a dual disk clutch?Finally got som quality time with the Charger again so I completed the exhaust wrapping, mounted clutch, bellhousing and gearbox. Of course I needed to do some manufacturing again. Had to make a bushing for the hydraulic throw-out bearing since the shims delivered didn't do the job..
View attachment 1023904 View attachment 1023906 View attachment 1023907 View attachment 1023908 View attachment 1023909 View attachment 1023910 View attachment 1023911
No, unfortunately not. Not sure if this clutch will hold up. Time will tell..Is that a dual disk clutch?
I guess the most important part of the installation is to get the correct ratio. APT's manual Said between 1:5 and 1:6. The way I did it got me closer to 1:6. Drilled a new hole in the pedal arm and made a bracket to off set the pushrod with about 70mm. 150mm of pedal travel gets me 25mm of movement on the pushrod.Thanks, I have been look at those and the McLeod systems for 2 of my projects.
My best guess is that you need to drill a new hole higher up on the pedal arm. What's your ratio now? How much can the pedal move before the MC's pushrod moves 1"?I was looking at your set up. I did a hydraulic MC/Slave set up on my Cuda (where I have a slave cylinder near the trans that pulls the clutch fork) and in that set up I made a bracket that positions the MC and the same angle as the original clutch rod. It seems to work ok but to be honest, the clutch is very heavy and I am not really happy with it. It could be the pressure plate I used or it could have to do with the MC and/or the slave cylinder; regardless it is something I need to figure out at some point. I have a 71 Charger I am putting a 5.7 into with a 4 spd as well as a 70 Roadrunner that I am putting a 66 426 Hemi and a 4 speed into and for those I am looking at other options such as the hyd TB and perhaps even factory linkage (which I would rather not use).