NJRR
Well-Known Member
If he had returned it within 30 days - no problem. But he didn't - so now he owns the problem.
This makes no sense ... If he's not using it and returning it for a refund, why did he wait so long would be the first question.
If he's not using it, why is he buying another would be the second question.
If he never used it, how does he know its defective would be the third question.
Since its past 30 days, the warranty route would be the final statement.
Because he waited to ******* long, that's why !
My statement that " he's not using it and returning it for a refund" was a response to your hypothetical of buying a tool, using it and returning it. By buying another and returning the defective one, he is not getting a tool for free, he is merely working around their discretionary policy of a time limit on a return ( of an unused, defective tool). I guess up in Ontario, you guys just like to march like good little ducks in a row.